蝦夷方言藻汐草

ウヱニ「雨」 → weni

Interpretation confidence: medium

Batchelor explicitly gives Wen-i for fine rain, with Wen-i ash for drizzling. This supports the historical rain word despite Tamura’s homonym referring to badness. Weni retains the supplied normalized spelling; Batchelor’s boundary notation is preserved as a comparison.

Batchelor 1938 s.v. Wen-i (p.556); 田村すず子 1996 s.v. weni

アベ「火」 → ape

Interpretation confidence: medium

Tamura directly gives ape for fire. The historical voiced ベ corresponds to pe in the modern transcription; the full form and gloss agree.

田村すず子 1996 s.v. ape

ウンジホ「火」 → uncipo

Interpretation confidence: medium

unci 'fire' + -po diminutive, matching the final ホ

Batchelor 1938 s.v. Unchipo 小サイ火 a small fire; 田村すず子 1996 s.v. unci 火

ワツカ「水」 → wakka

Interpretation confidence: medium

Kayano and Tamura directly give wakka for water. The medial ツ records the consonant sequence kk. Specific distinctions concerning drinking water or hot water are not expressed in the historical gloss.

萱野茂 1996 s.v. wakka; 田村すず子 1996 s.v. wakka

ベ「水」 → pe

Interpretation confidence: medium

Nakagawa gives pe for water, moisture and juice; Tamura describes water contained in or adhering to something. This supports 水 with a broader or different scope from wakka. The nominalizer pe meaning thing is a separate sense.

中川裕 1995 s.v. pe¹; 田村すず子 1996 s.v. pe

コンル「氷」 → konru

Interpretation confidence: medium

Both dictionaries directly identify konru as ice. Tamura tentatively compares Japanese koori, while Kayano offers a kor-ru analysis. The lexical identification does not require choosing between those etymologies.

田村すず子 1996 s.v. konru; 萱野茂 1996 s.v. konru

ウーラリ「霧」 → urari

Interpretation confidence: medium

Batchelor explicitly records Urari for mist or haze, supporting the historical final リ. Nakagawa’s koyki example also has Roman urari with a mist meaning, but its corresponding kana is ウラㇼ: that source corroborates the sense while leaving an internal spelling discrepancy. Tamura’s urar covers fog, haze and mist and remains an alternative. The earlier 霧/霞 difference is within the documented semantic range; the historical long mark remains in the source transcription.

Batchelor 1938 s.v. Urari (p.539); 中川裕 1995 s.v. koyki; 田村すず子 1996 s.v. úrar

ムンベ「露」 → munpe

Interpretation confidence: medium

Batchelor explicitly glosses Mun-pe as dew, supporting 露. Munpe follows the joined spelling used in modern lexical notation. Tamura uses munpe for grass sap and distinguishes kinape as dew, so that modern sense alone would not validate the historical gloss. NINJAL corpus record ninjal-dict/061#14 also gives munpe for dew. Kinape is a meaning comparison with different sounds.

Batchelor 1938 s.v. Mun-pe (p.308); 田村すず子 1996 s.v. munpe

ベケレチユツプ「日」 → peker cup

Interpretation confidence: medium

Tomita directly records peker cup for the sun in Ishikari. The written レ and プ can render final /r/ and /p/. The lexical comparison supports 日 without independently establishing the historical speaker’s dialect.

富田友幸 2021 s.v. peker cup

クンネチユツプ「月」 → kunnecup

Interpretation confidence: medium

Tamura and Kayano directly record kunnecup for the moon. The complete クンネチユツプ remains readable even though a separate alternative on the same line is damaged. The joined dictionary form supplies the missing interpretation; the spaced form is a word-division comparison.

田村すず子 1996 s.v. kunnecup; 萱野茂 1996 s.v. kunnecup

チユツ゚カモイ「日月」 → cup kamuy

Interpretation confidence: medium

Kayano gives cupkamuy for the sun or moon deity, and Nakagawa’s cup kamuy names the sun. These support the lexical comparison with 日月. The current transcription チユツ゚カモイ has an unusual marked final consonant, but comparison with nearby プ glyphs in the facsimile makes チユプカモイ a credible alternative visual reading. The transcription is preserved and the glyph remains qualified; an actual /t/ versus /p/ sound difference is not established. カモイ is compared with modern kamuy, without equating the historical vowels.

萱野茂 1996 s.v. cupkamuy; 中川裕 1995 s.v. cup kamuy; 国立国語研究所『蝦夷方言藻汐草』乾巻 p.7 日月（原画像）

ノチウ「星」 → nociw

Interpretation confidence: medium

Both dictionaries directly give nociw for star. The final ウ represents the modern final glide w; the historical form and gloss agree.

中川裕 1995 s.v. nociw; 田村すず子 1996 s.v. nociw

リコツプ「星」 → rikop

Interpretation confidence: medium

Batchelor directly records Rikop for a star or something overhead. The final ツプ is compared with final p. This source supports the meaning, but it does not supply the Bihoro dialect attribution previously asserted in the note.

Batchelor 1938 s.v. Rikop (p.423)

ケダ「星」 → keta

Interpretation confidence: low

Ota explicitly lists keta for star in Soya. Batchelor’s Keta instead means by the side of or in; that homonym is irrelevant. The modern regional comparison fits ケダ but does not independently establish the early star name, so low certainty is retained.

太田 2022 s.v. ほし(星); Batchelor 1938 s.v. Keta (p.247)

キミタ「山」 → kim ta

Interpretation confidence: medium

Kayano prints kimta with the analysis kim ta, in the mountains. The record supplies a phrase where the Japanese gloss is the noun 山; that difference in grammatical form is retained. The historical ミ can render final m before ta.

萱野茂 1996 s.v. kimta

キモロ「山」 → kimor, -o

Interpretation confidence: medium

Batchelor Kim-oro means among the mountains, which supports a spatial analysis but does not establish kimor as a mountain noun. Kim oro preserves the recorded final vowel; kim or is another possible segmentation. Neither resolves the difference between an adverbial expression and the Japanese noun 山, so the inherited notation remains unresolved.

Batchelor 1938 s.v. Kim-oro (p.252)

ヌブリ「岳」 → nupuri

Interpretation confidence: medium

Tamura directly records nupuri as a mountain. This fits 岳 and the voiced ブ in the historical spelling. The term does not by itself specify a peak or a particular kind of mountain.

田村すず子 1996 s.v. nupuri

イワ「岳」 → iwa

Interpretation confidence: medium

Tamura gives iwa for a rocky mountain or mountain country; Nakagawa describes a mountain associated with spiritual power. Both support a mountain sense within the historical 岳, with their differing ranges retained.

田村すず子 1996 s.v. iwa; 中川裕 1995 s.v. iwa

ベツ「川」 → pet

Interpretation confidence: medium

Tamura’s noun pet directly means river. The historical ツ can render final t. The adjacent dictionary root pet for watery or fresh material is a different sense.

田村すず子 1996 s.v. pet

チヌカルグル「北斗」 → cinukarkur

Interpretation confidence: medium

Ota explicitly identifies Cinukarkur with the Big Dipper, fitting 北斗. Batchelor’s related Chinukara-guru is glossed north star, so the sources disagree about the celestial referent. Cinukara kur preserves Batchelor’s extra vowel as a comparison. NINJAL corpus record ninjal-dict/043#32 also gives cinukarkur for 北斗七星. The agreement in form and explicit Big Dipper gloss supports retaining medium certainty; the different referents in the comparative sources remain distinct.

太田 2022 s.v. ほくとしちせい(北斗七星); Batchelor 1938 s.v. Chinukara-guru (p.82)

アツ゚イ「海」 → atuy

Interpretation confidence: medium

Tamura directly gives atuy for the sea. The marked ツ゚ is compatible with tu and final イ with y. The full historical form and gloss agree.

田村すず子 1996 s.v. atuy

ルヽ「海」 → rur

Interpretation confidence: low

Nakagawa’s rur names sea water, while Tamura treats this as a noun root. This supports a sea-water comparison within the broader 海. Expanding the repetition gives ルル; the final vowel and use as a free sea noun remain open, so low certainty is retained.

中川裕 1995 s.v. rur, -i; 田村すず子 1996 s.v. rur

レプタ「沖」 → rep ta

Interpretation confidence: medium

Tamura gives the locative phrase rep ta in examples concerning offshore or overseas locations. Batchelor also records Repta, at sea. The spaced form follows the documented phrase and accounts for the recorded final タ; the historical gloss labels the place rather than spelling out the locative relation.

田村すず子 1996 s.v. rep; Batchelor 1938 s.v. Repta (p.420)

レブン「沖へ出」 → repun

Interpretation confidence: medium

Tamura explicitly records the intransitive verb repun, go out to sea. This directly explains 沖へ出. Its homonymous attributive form, offshore, is not needed to account for the verb-like gloss.

田村すず子 1996 s.v. repun

レプケ「沖へ出」 → repke

Interpretation confidence: low

Tamura gives repke(he) as the possessed form of rep, offshore, and Tomita lists repke for offshore in Shizunai. The form is supported, but the inherited 沖へ出 gloss implies movement that this noun alone does not express. Low certainty retains that difference.

田村すず子 1996 s.v. rep; 富田友幸 2021 s.v. repke

シリイツ゚「崎」 → sir'etu

Interpretation confidence: low

Kayano’s cape noun sir’etu and Batchelor’s Shiretu support the lexical identification. The spelling sir’etu follows Kayano’s headword. The historical シリイツ゚ has an extra or different vowel before tu compared with these forms, so low certainty remains; the spacing and apostrophe-free spellings are comparisons.

萱野茂 1996 s.v. sir'etu; Batchelor 1938 s.v. Shiretu (p.464)

シレツ゚「崎」 → sir'etu

Interpretation confidence: medium

Kayano directly records the cape noun sir’etu; Batchelor’s Shiretu has the matching シレツ kana. The spelling follows Kayano’s headword for the complete noun. Apostrophe-free siretu is also documented by Tomita.

萱野茂 1996 s.v. sir'etu; Batchelor 1938 s.v. Shiretu (p.464); 富田友幸 2021 s.v. siretu

シタコレ「霜」 → sitakore

Interpretation confidence: medium

Batchelor explicitly records Shitakore, hoar frost, with シタコレ. Normalizing sh to s yields sitakore and directly supports 霜. This is a later historical dictionary comparison, without an inferred derivation or early pronunciation claim.

Batchelor 1938 s.v. Shitakore (p.471)

クルツベ「霜」 → kuruppe

Interpretation confidence: medium

Nakagawa and Kayano directly identify kuruppe as frost. The historical ツベ is compatible with the consonant sequence pp under voiced kana spelling.

中川裕 1995 s.v. kuruppe; 萱野茂 1996 s.v. kuruppe

カムイフミ「雷」 → kamuy humi

Interpretation confidence: high

kamuy 'god' + hum-i 'its sound'; the record writes the possessive humi

田村すず子 1996『アイヌ語沙流方言辞典』s.v. kamuyhum 雷, s.v. humi 音; 萱野茂 1996 s.v. kamuyhum 雷、雷の音

カンナカムイフミ「雷」 → kanna kamuy humi

Interpretation confidence: high

kanna kamuy 'the god above' + hum-i 'its sound'

萱野茂 1996『萱野茂のアイヌ語辞典』s.v. kannakamuy 雷神; 田村すず子 1996 s.v. kamuyhum 雷, s.v. humi

モシリ「島」 → mosir

Interpretation confidence: medium

Tamura explicitly includes island among the meanings of mosir, alongside land and country. This supports 島. Final リ is compared with modern final r; selecting the lemma does not settle whether an extra vowel was pronounced.

田村すず子 1996 s.v. mosir

ル「道路」 → ru

Interpretation confidence: medium

Tamura’s ru noun explicitly means track or path and supports 道路. Its homonyms meaning melt, toilet or a nominalized event are irrelevant to this road entry.

田村すず子 1996 s.v. ru

ベナケ「川上」 → penake

Interpretation confidence: medium

Tamura explicitly gives penake as the possessed location form meaning its upstream side. The recorded final ケ supports the whole form and 川上 matches its direction. The unrelated Batchelor throat homonym is not evidence for this entry.

田村すず子 1996 s.v. pénake

ベナタ「川上」 → pena ta

Interpretation confidence: medium

Kayano gives penata with the analysis pena ta, the upper direction or part; ta is the locative particle. This supports a phrase for the upstream area in the paired 川上/川下 context.

萱野茂 1996 s.v. penata; 田村すず子 1996 s.v. ta

ベナケタ「川上」 → penake ta

Interpretation confidence: medium

The recorded ending ケタ is accounted for by penake, upstream side, followed by locative ta. Batchelor’s Penaketa, the upper place or up above, supports the complete combination. The spaced form retains every recorded component; corpus record biratori/003/004#199 also uses penake ta for an upstream location.

田村すず子 1996 s.v. pénake; 田村すず子 1996 s.v. ta; Batchelor 1938 s.v. Penaketa (p.387)

バナケ「川下」 → panake

Interpretation confidence: medium

The downstream sense of pana has the possessed form panake(he), explicitly given by Tamura and Nakagawa. The recorded バナケ includes -ke; pana meaning dust is a different dictionary sense.

田村すず子 1996 s.v. pána 川下; 中川裕 1995 s.v. pana',-ke

バナタ「川下」 → pana ta

Interpretation confidence: medium

Kayano gives panata with the analysis pana ta, in the lower direction. Tamura’s downstream pana supplies the directional sense appropriate to 川下. The spaced form is parallel to pena ta and is used with a downstream meaning in biratori/024/004#49; the dust homonym of pana is excluded.

萱野茂 1996 s.v. panata; 田村すず子 1996 s.v. pána

バナケタ「川下」 → panake ta

Interpretation confidence: medium

Tamura gives panake(he) for the downstream side and ta as the locative particle. Together panake ta account for the complete バナケタ; the earlier panake omitted the written final タ. The grammar and paired upstream entry support this reading, and corpus record biratori/003/002#2 uses i=panake ta for a downstream location. That later evidence does not date the phrase to the manuscript.

田村すず子 1996 s.v. pána; 田村すず子 1996 s.v. ta

ベツヲシヨロ「川尻」 → pet'osor, o

Interpretation confidence: medium

Pet and osor support a possible river/buttocks or rear-part analysis. The complete expression and its final vowel are not independently identified in the consulted dictionaries. The source’s apostrophe and suffix notation remain unresolved.

田村すず子 1996 s.v. pet 川, osor 尻; 春日勇人『アイヌ語方言データベース』2016シート

ベツシヨロ「川尻」 → pet osoro

Interpretation confidence: low

Pet means river and osoro is a possessed form of osor, buttocks or rear. These components suggest a river’s rear or end, especially beside the recorded ベツヲシヨロ alternative. The complete expression is not established by the component evidence, and ベツシヨロ itself does not transparently write the initial o of osoro. Pet soro is only a closer segmentation of the kana, with its meaning unconfirmed.

田村すず子 1996 s.v. pet; 中川裕 1995 s.v. osor, -o

ベツブツ「川尻」 → petput

Interpretation confidence: medium

Petput is directly attested for a river mouth. It is used here as the lexical identification. The final ツ alone does not prove a separate possessed vowel; the source’s proposed petputu remains an alternative without equivalent independent support.

田村すず子 1996 s.v. petput 川口; 萱野茂 1996 s.v. petput 川下、河口、川尻

コタン「処」 → kotan

Interpretation confidence: low

Tamura gives kotan for a village, settlement or inhabited region. This can identify the sort of place intended by 処, but it is narrower than an unrestricted word for place. The form is supported and the broad Japanese gloss remains qualified.

田村すず子 1996 s.v. kotan; 中川裕 1995 s.v. kotan,-u

コイ「浪」 → koy

Interpretation confidence: medium

Nakagawa directly gives the wave noun koy, also elicited in Mukawa. Tamura restricts koy to a word-building root in Saru and uses rir as the free noun; that dialect restriction does not invalidate the historical entry.

中川裕 1995 s.v. koy; 田村すず子 1996 s.v. koy; 千葉大学鵡川辞書 chiba-mukawa/1#4007

リヽ「うねり」 → rir

Interpretation confidence: medium

Tamura gives rir for a wave, compatible with the swell heading. The repetition mark expands to リリ; final リ is interpreted as /r/, while riri remains a literal vowel comparison.

田村すず子 1996 s.v. rir

ムカンネリ「うねり」 → mukannere

Interpretation confidence: low

Batchelor glosses Mukannere as undulating land, which does not establish a sea swell. The related historical comparison explains water rising without breaking, but its modern romanization is inherited editorial evidence. Final リ versus selected re also remains unsettled. Mukanneri preserves that vowel as a comparison only.

Batchelor 1938 p.306 s.v. Mukannere; 加賀家文書『蝦夷語和解』深澤美香 2016 対照データ s.v. ムカン子リ

ナイ「沢」 → nay

Interpretation confidence: medium

Both Japanese dictionary definitions directly identify a stream or stream valley as 沢. Tamura’s broader English swamp/marsh wording should not displace this Japanese sense.

田村すず子 1996 s.v. nay; 中川裕 1995 s.v. nay

トー「沼」 → to

Interpretation confidence: medium

The water-body noun to explicitly includes 沼. Homonyms for day, ten and a particle are irrelevant to this entry; the historical length mark is retained in the source field.

田村すず子 1996 s.v. to（湖・池・沼）

シリシユムイ「地震」 → sirsimoye

Interpretation confidence: high

sir 'the land' + simoye 'moves'; the kana シユムイ renders simoye

萱野茂 1996『萱野茂のアイヌ語辞典』s.v. sirsimoye 地震; 田村すず子 1996 s.v. sir-simoye 地震が起こる

カウ〳〵「あられ」 → kawkaw

Interpretation confidence: medium

The repetition mark gives kawkaw, directly attested for あられ. Tamura distinguishes hail as konru, while Kayano includes both あられ and ひょう; this review follows the recorded Japanese heading.

田村すず子 1996 s.v. kawkaw; 萱野茂 1996 s.v. kawkaw