Aynuitak Huskokampi Aomarepu アイヌ語古記録データベース Early Records Database of the Ainu Language

蝦夷方言藻汐草

えぞほうげん もしおぐさ · Ezo hōgen moshiogusa · 上原熊次郎・阿部長三郎 · 1792 · Wordlist · Place names · Characters · Catalogue record

Names & terms

Names and expressions in this work, with attestations in each witness.

All entries

3312 entries · 3397 attestations

Downloads: CSV · JSON · JSONL

「曠野」

Ota lists sircaroonne for a broad wetland with the source label 蝦夷記; the neighboring sitcaroonne is explicitly marked 新. Only the former is a historical-source comparison. Batchelor Shiricharonne means a broad space of land, supporting the terrain sense with a different vowel sequence. Use the quoted whole form sircaroonne rather than implying that the earlier sir + caro + onne segmentation is established. Modern everyday usage, exact boundaries and the correspondence between the historical vowel sequences remain unverified; all compared whole-form queries return zero.
References
Occurrences (1)
  1. National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics · 乾巻 · Page 16, line 14 · シリチヤロヲンネ

    …リ日和ニシヨロアン晴れ日ニシヨロヲカケアン◯ウヽラリイチヤク曠野シリチヤロヲンネ シリヌフカヲンネ柳原シユ〳〵タイ畠トイタ砂岸ヲタウニ石岸シユマウニ湾わどシツテキシヤム小湾こだ…

「曠野」

The companion transcription gives sirnupkaonne for this source expression. Batchelor nupka means plain/table-land and onne includes great, whereas Kayano nupka denotes a hill. These support a terrain comparison but do not independently attest the complete expression or settle its segmentation. Hirayama’s local text has the variant シリヌフカラン子 and supplies no modern equivalent. Retain the inherited whole-form proposal at low confidence; sir nupka onne and siri nupka onne are analytical alternatives, not verified phrases.
References
Occurrences (1)
  1. National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics · 乾巻 · Page 16, line 14 · シリヌフカヲンネ

    …晴れ日ニシヨロヲカケアン◯ウヽラリイチヤク曠野シリチヤロヲンネ シリヌフカヲンネ柳原シユ〳〵タイ畠トイタ砂岸ヲタウニ石岸シユマウニ湾わどシツテキシヤム小湾こだ?モイ遥ヲマンノボ…

「柳原」

susutaymedium
The repetition gives シユシユタイ, matching Hirayama’s source headword. Tamura and Kayano identify susu as willow and tay as a wooded stand, supporting susutay for 柳原. This is stronger evidence than the earlier fuzzy match to the companion spelling シュタヱ. The spaced susu tay is a segmentation comparison. Neither full-form corpus query matches, so the compound interpretation rests on the source and attested components.
References
Occurrences (1)
  1. National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics · 乾巻 · Page 16, line 15 · シユ〳〵タイ

    …アン◯ウヽラリイチヤク曠野シリチヤロヲンネ シリヌフカヲンネ柳原シユ〳〵タイ畠トイタ砂岸ヲタウニ石岸シユマウニ湾わどシツテキシヤム小湾こだ?モイ遥ヲマンノボ岐ルヲコビ不近ち…

「畠」

toytamedium
Tamura, Kayano and Batchelor describe cultivating, farming or working a field. The corpus supports that activity, including a narrative catalogued as recorded in 1934. The Japanese 畠 names the field, so the recorded pair has a noun/activity mismatch. Retain toyta as the reading of the kana, without silently redefining it as a field noun. toy is a related land/field comparison, but omits the recorded タ and is not selected.
References
Occurrences (1)
  1. National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics · 乾巻 · Page 16, line 16 · トイタ

    …イチヤク曠野シリチヤロヲンネ シリヌフカヲンネ柳原シユ〳〵タイ畠トイタ砂岸ヲタウニ石岸シユマウニ湾わどシツテキシヤム小湾こだ?モイ遥ヲマンノボ岐ルヲコビ不近ちかからず…

「砂岸」

The companion transcription lists otauni under 砂岸; Hirayama repeats the source entry without a modern equivalent. ota independently means sand, but these records do not establish the complete expression’s phonology or the ending ウニ. The published otawni was mechanically converted from otauni. Retain it provisionally at low confidence, comparing the unconverted form and a possible ota un i division. That division is a morphological guess and supplies no verified shore expression. All three corpus queries return zero.
春日勇人2016シート・深澤美香2016対応表 s.v. ヲタウニ「砂岸」; 平山裕人 2013 第3部 s.v. オタウニ「① 砂岸;②」; 田村すず子 1996 s.v. ota「砂。… / (目的語の一つは液体、 一つは場所。…」, un「①(連体句をつくる、 つまり名詞にかかる。… / (強めの一種、 考慮・納得を表すことが多い。… / ①(そこ)にある、 (そこ)につく、 (ふたが)(そこに)しまる。… / ①(名詞・副詞の後で、 ne ネ《…だ》を言わずに文を終止する。…」Source passage
References
Occurrences (1)
  1. National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics · 乾巻 · Page 16, line 17 · ヲタウニ

    …野シリチヤロヲンネ シリヌフカヲンネ柳原シユ〳〵タイ畠トイタ砂岸ヲタウニ石岸シユマウニ湾わどシツテキシヤム小湾こだ?モイ遥ヲマンノボ岐ルヲコビ不近ちかからずハンケコー◯…

「石岸」

The companion transcription lists sumauni under 石岸; Hirayama supplies the recorded heading without a modern equivalent. suma independently means stone, while the shared ウニ ending remains unidentified. The published sumawni was mechanically converted from sumauni. Retain it provisionally at low confidence, comparing sumauni and the speculative division suma un i. No whole-expression corpus match supports any of these candidates.
春日勇人2016シート・深澤美香2016対応表 s.v. シュマウニ「石岸」; 平山裕人 2013 第3部 s.v. シュマウニ「① 石岸;②」; 田村すず子 1996 s.v. suma「石。…」, un「①(連体句をつくる、 つまり名詞にかかる。… / (強めの一種、 考慮・納得を表すことが多い。… / ①(そこ)にある、 (そこ)につく、 (ふたが)(そこに)しまる。… / ①(名詞・副詞の後で、 ne ネ《…だ》を言わずに文を終止する。…」Source passage
References
Occurrences (1)
  1. National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics · 乾巻 · Page 16, line 18 · シユマウニ

    …ヲンネ シリヌフカヲンネ柳原シユ〳〵タイ畠トイタ砂岸ヲタウニ石岸シユマウニ湾わどシツテキシヤム小湾こだ?モイ遥ヲマンノボ岐ルヲコビ不近ちかからずハンケコー◯トイノコ郊コタ…

「湾 わど」

sitteksammedium
The recorded form ends in ム. Tamura gives sitteksam for a coastal area; the companion transcription also proposes sitteksam. This supports removing the added final -a in the previous place-name comparison. The broader coastal sense leaves its relationship to the Japanese 湾 qualified. Hirayama reads the Japanese annotation わだ, while the current transcription has わど; the original field is preserved. The three corpus matches concern coastal areas, including two entries in the modern NINJAL edition.
References
Occurrences (1)
  1. National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics · 乾巻 · Page 17, line 1 · シツテキシヤム

    …カヲンネ柳原シユ〳〵タイ畠トイタ砂岸ヲタウニ石岸シユマウニ湾わどシツテキシヤム小湾こだ?モイ遥ヲマンノボ岐ルヲコビ不近ちかからずハンケコー◯トイノコ郊コタンイーバキタ庭ウーシ…

モイ

Ainu

「小湾 こだ?」

moymedium
Batchelor explicitly includes a sheltered sea bay and sheltered river bend under Moi, supporting moy for 小湾. Tamura, Kayano and Nakagawa describe eddies or sheltered river water. The unresolved Japanese annotation こだ? does not invalidate the visible 小湾 heading. All six corpus matches were inspected: two are recent place-name proposals, two are interrupted speech, one has the questionable gloss 縁, and NINJAL lists moy; us against 渦巻; 湾. That last row cannot assign its second gloss to its first form. The bay identification rests on the dictionary sense, without counting all six records as bay attestations.
References
Occurrences (1)
  1. National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics · 乾巻 · Page 17, line 2 · モイ

    …畠トイタ砂岸ヲタウニ石岸シユマウニ湾わどシツテキシヤム小湾こだ?モイ遥ヲマンノボ岐ルヲコビ不近ちかからずハンケコー◯トイノコ郊コタンイーバキタ庭ウーシヤタ炎ほのほイ…

「遥」

omannopomedium
The facsimile has initial ヲ. Batchelor Oman-no-po means distant/far and Hirayama quotes this comparison under オマンノボ. omannopo follows the recorded initial without adding h. Spaced oman no po records a possible division; its full historical grammar remains unsettled. The competing homannopo comes from the companion ホマンノボ, while homanno itself means faintly or vaguely in modern dictionaries and the two retrieved contexts. Neither complete candidate has a corpus match. Hirayama and the second transcription of Batchelor provide cross-checks of the cited reading, without establishing independent historical uses.
References
Occurrences (1)
  1. National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics · 乾巻 · Page 17, line 3 · ヲマンノボ

    …タ砂岸ヲタウニ石岸シユマウニ湾わどシツテキシヤム小湾こだ?モイ遥ヲマンノボ岐ルヲコビ不近ちかからずハンケコー◯トイノコ郊コタンイーバキタ庭ウーシヤタ炎ほのほイベクヽ隣アウ…

「岐」

ruokopimedium
The source 岐 and ルヲコビ agree with Batchelor Ru-okopi, a place where two roads meet. Okop separately means a parting place or division. This supports ruokopi; the companion table has the different Japanese heading 追訣. ru okopi is a boundary comparison; ruokop omits the source’s final vowel and has no retrieved whole-form support. The complete expression has no corpus match, so its dictionary attestation is reported separately from running-text evidence.
References
Occurrences (1)
  1. National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics · 乾巻 · Page 17, line 4 · ルヲコビ

    …ニ石岸シユマウニ湾わどシツテキシヤム小湾こだ?モイ遥ヲマンノボ岐ルヲコビ不近ちかからずハンケコー◯トイノコ郊コタンイーバキタ庭ウーシヤタ炎ほのほイベクヽ隣アウタ泥テイネ…

「不近 ちかからず」

hankekomedium
References
Occurrences (1)
  1. National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics · 乾巻 · Page 17, line 5 · ハンケコー

    …シツテキシヤム小湾こだ?モイ遥ヲマンノボ岐ルヲコビ不近ちかからずハンケコー◯トイノコ郊コタンイーバキタ庭ウーシヤタ炎ほのほイベクヽ隣アウタ泥テイネトイ兀はげ山イビツ゚シル…

「不近 ちかからず」

toynokoguess
Hirayama records トイノコ with 近からず but leaves the modern identification blank. toynoko is a provisional reading with guess confidence. tuynoko compares a possible トイ versus tuy representation, without explaining noko. tuyma no supplies a distant-expression comparison but would require replacing the recorded ending; it is not selected. Zero full-form corpus matches leave both the segmentation and lexical identity unresolved.
References
Occurrences (1)
  1. National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics · 乾巻 · Page 17, line 5 · トイノコ

    …ム小湾こだ?モイ遥ヲマンノボ岐ルヲコビ不近ちかからずハンケコー◯トイノコ郊コタンイーバキタ庭ウーシヤタ炎ほのほイベクヽ隣アウタ泥テイネトイ兀はげ山イビツ゚シル シリカハ…

「郊」

Tamura explicitly uses kotan eepak ta for meeting someone at the village edge, and lists eepaki as a related locative form. Kayano separates ta in its analysis of eepakita. The proposed kotan eepaki ta makes that boundary explicit while retaining low confidence: the source’s イー differs from ee, and the fully matching phrase was not retrieved. kotan ipaki ta is a more literal vowel comparison without independent lexical support. The one kotan eepak ta corpus record is a 2023 post and lacks the source’s ki syllable; it supports a semantic comparison only. The companion コタンエイバケタ is a differing transcription of related historical material.
Tamura 1996 s.v. eepak「(所は eepaki(hi) エエパキ(ヒ), eepakke(he) エエパッケ(ヘ)) ①次。…」, eepaki(hi)「(概は eepak エエパㇰ) その次(の所/こと)。…」; Kayano 1996 s.v. eepak/eepaki(ke)「エエパㇰ/エエパキ(ケ) 【eepak/eepaki(ke)】近く.…」, eepakita「その次に,次いで.…」; Hirayama 2013 part 3 s.v. コタンイーバキタ「① 郊;②」Source passage
References
Occurrences (1)
  1. National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics · 乾巻 · Page 17, line 6 · コタンイーバキタ

    …?モイ遥ヲマンノボ岐ルヲコビ不近ちかからずハンケコー◯トイノコ郊コタンイーバキタ庭ウーシヤタ炎ほのほイベクヽ隣アウタ泥テイネトイ兀はげ山イビツ゚シル シリカハルムル寒メイ冷ヤム…

「庭」

usataguess
usata is a provisional Latin reading with guess confidence. Batchelor Usata describes the western side of a fireplace, and Hirayama explicitly questions its fit with 庭. Tamura usata concerns succeeding generations and cousin relationships; both retrieved usata contexts concern kinship. Neither meaning identifies a garden or yard. usa ta is a segmentation comparison; usara compares Hirayama’s nearby ウシヤロロ lower-seat entry and would require a different final consonant. The source’s long vowel and lexical meaning remain unresolved.
Batchelor 1938 s.v. Usata「n. The western side of a fire-place.」, PDF p.542; Tamura 1996 s.v. usata「①(=usa ta ウサ タ)後世に次々に、 次々の世代に続いて。…」; Hirayama 2013 part 3 s.v. ウーシヤタ「① 庭;② 炉の西側(usata)だが」Source passage
References
Occurrences (1)
  1. National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics · 乾巻 · Page 17, line 7 · ウーシヤタ

    …岐ルヲコビ不近ちかからずハンケコー◯トイノコ郊コタンイーバキタ庭ウーシヤタ炎ほのほイベクヽ隣アウタ泥テイネトイ兀はげ山イビツ゚シル シリカハルムル寒メイ冷ヤム暖ポプケ熱セ…

「炎 ほのほ」

Batchelor explicitly gives flame and the example Abe nipek, providing a direct semantic comparison with 炎. Recorded oral examples also use ape nipek for firelight. The facsimile still has イベクヽ: initial n is absent and the final repetition remains unexplained. nipek remains a low-confidence hypothesis; ipek and repetition-explicit ipekku are literal comparisons with no retrieved corpus matches. The earlier initial-n-loss proposal was attributed to private correspondence whose text remains uninspected; that attribution supplies no verified phonological evidence.
Batchelor 1938 s.v. Nipek「n. A flame. Brightness. Splendour. As:—Abe nipek, “a flame of fire.” Syn: Nikep. Nipeki. Nupek. Nupeki.」, PDF p.323; Tamura 1996 s.v. nipek「(所は nipeki(hi) ニペキ(ヒ)) 光、 輝き、 明るみ、 つや。…」; Hirayama 2013 part 3 s.v. イベク「① 炎(ほのお);②」Source passage
References
Occurrences (1)
  1. National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics · 乾巻 · Page 17, line 8 · イベクヽ

    …からずハンケコー◯トイノコ郊コタンイーバキタ庭ウーシヤタ炎ほのほイベクヽ隣アウタ泥テイネトイ兀はげ山イビツ゚シル シリカハルムル寒メイ冷ヤム暖ポプケ熱セヽク湯セヽカ飛火…

「隣」

awtamedium
春日勇人『アイヌ語方言データベース』2016シート:蝦夷方言藻汐草のローマ字表記;和解は加賀家文書『蝦夷語和解』(深澤美香 2016)による;見出し アウタ「隣」;和解「声聞合」(現代語訳「[声を聞き合う]」)Source passage
References
Occurrences (1)
  1. National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics · 乾巻 · Page 17, line 9 · アウタ

    …ケコー◯トイノコ郊コタンイーバキタ庭ウーシヤタ炎ほのほイベクヽ隣アウタ泥テイネトイ兀はげ山イビツ゚シル シリカハルムル寒メイ冷ヤム暖ポプケ熱セヽク湯セヽカ飛火アベプシ…

「泥」

teyne toymedium
The source clearly records テイネトイ, and Tamura’s teyne wet plus toy soil explains the phrase. NINJAL explicitly gives teyne toy for wet soil/mud, supporting word separation. Its one corpus record duplicates that dictionary entry. NINJAL’s modern edition adds transcription and elicited speech to an 1898 base; the corpus’s 1898 label does not date this modern representation. The companion table has the different transcription テイ子ト.
Tamura 1996 s.v. teyne「ぬれる、 ぬれた、 ぬれている。…」, toy「土地、 地面、 田畑。…」; NINJAL Topical Dictionary of Conversational Ainu, 地, ninjal-dict/039#25Source passage
References
Occurrences (1)
  1. National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics · 乾巻 · Page 17, line 10 · テイネトイ

    …トイノコ郊コタンイーバキタ庭ウーシヤタ炎ほのほイベクヽ隣アウタ泥テイネトイ兀はげ山イビツ゚シル シリカハルムル寒メイ冷ヤム暖ポプケ熱セヽク湯セヽカ飛火アベプシ昔フシコ今タ…

「兀 はげ山」

ipitsirguess
The facsimile shows a small circle beside the marked ツ in the preserved イビツ゚シル transcription. Hirayama prints the different イビトッシル and compares Ipichi bare plus sir land. Modernized ipici sir is therefore a semantic alternative, but neither the marked syllable nor the full compound has been securely identified. ipitu sir/ipitusir are provisional comparisons if the marked kana represents tu; that value is not established from this image alone. ipitsir remains a guess. Ota’s atusanupuri and epitcenupuri are explicitly marked 新 and are excluded as historical identifications.
Hirayama 2013 part 3 s.v. イビトッシル「① 兀(はげ)、はげ山;② 禿げた(ipichi)地(シリ)」; Batchelor 1938 s.v. Ipichi「adj. Bare.」, PDF p.197; Tamura 1996 s.v. sir「地、 山、 島、 そのあたり、 様子、 見える有様。… / (…している)様子、 …の。…」Source passage
References
Occurrences (1)
  1. National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics · 乾巻 · Page 17, line 11 · イビツ゚シル

    …ーバキタ庭ウーシヤタ炎ほのほイベクヽ隣アウタ泥テイネトイ兀はげ山イビツ゚シル シリカハルムル寒メイ冷ヤム暖ポプケ熱セヽク湯セヽカ飛火アベプシ昔フシコ今タネ当年タンバ明年ヲヤ…

「兀 はげ山」

Tamura sirka supports only the initial ground/surface comparison. Hirayama lists the historical form with the bald-mountain heading but gives no modern identification. The remainder parmur has not been identified in the consulted dictionaries. The source’s ハ could be compared with ha as in sirkaharmur; the selected pa correspondence and loss of final u in sirkaparmur remain assumptions. Spaced sirka parmur/sir ka parmur and vowel-explicit sirkaparmuru are alternatives to inspect, without established complete morphology. The complete form has guess confidence. Ota’s modern bald-mountain coinages are excluded.
Tamura 1996 s.v. sirka「(所は sirkasi シㇼカシ、 sirkaske シㇼカㇱケ)[sir-ka 地/あたり・の上] ①地面や床(ゆか)の上。… / 刀のさやの外側、 刀のさや。…」; Hirayama 2013 part 3 s.v. シリカハルムル「① 兀(はげ)、はげ山;②」Source passage
References
Occurrences (1)
  1. National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics · 乾巻 · Page 17, line 11 · シリカハルムル

    …シヤタ炎ほのほイベクヽ隣アウタ泥テイネトイ兀はげ山イビツ゚シル シリカハルムル寒メイ冷ヤム暖ポプケ熱セヽク湯セヽカ飛火アベプシ昔フシコ今タネ当年タンバ明年ヲヤバ去年シヤキネ去…

メイ

Ainu

「寒」

memedium
The coldness meaning is directly supported. Tamura and Nakagawa describe me as a root used in compounds, whereas Kayano gives 寒さ and Mukawa data contain elicited me. The source’s final イ remains to be explained, leaving the me identification qualified. The only literal mei corpus match is the name Louisa May Alcott and supplies no coldness evidence. The 42 me matches include fragments and editorial labels, alongside actual coldness uses.
References
Occurrences (1)
  1. National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics · 乾巻 · Page 17, line 12 · メイ

    …ベクヽ隣アウタ泥テイネトイ兀はげ山イビツ゚シル シリカハルムル寒メイ冷ヤム暖ポプケ熱セヽク湯セヽカ飛火アベプシ昔フシコ今タネ当年タンバ明年ヲヤバ去年シヤキネ去々年ホ…

ヤム

Ainu

「冷」

yammedium
Batchelor distinguishes Yam cool from its chestnut homonym. Coldness is also present in the retrieved Oda narrative and Kuzuno texts, so the Japanese 冷 is supported. Tamura’s yam chestnut entry and many corpus matches belong to another sense. nam is an independently attested cold-word comparison, including Batchelor’s synonym, but changing the source’s ヤ to ナ is unnecessary.
Batchelor 1938 s.v. Yam cool, PDF p.575; Hirayama 2013 part 3 s.v. ヤム¹「① 冷;② 〈地名〉冷くアル (yam)」; Tamura 1996 s.v. nam「冷たい(「しゃっこい」)、 (熱くあるべきものが)ぬるい。…」 and yam「栗(の実)。…」Source passage
References
Occurrences (1)
  1. National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics · 乾巻 · Page 17, line 13 · ヤム

    …隣アウタ泥テイネトイ兀はげ山イビツ゚シル シリカハルムル寒メイ冷ヤム暖ポプケ熱セヽク湯セヽカ飛火アベプシ昔フシコ今タネ当年タンバ明年ヲヤバ去年シヤキネ去々年ホシケシ…

「暖」

popkemedium
All three dictionaries give warm for popke, directly matching 暖 and the recorded ポプケ. Tamura distinguishes the person/object predicate from weather sir-popke, while noting the range of ordinary warmth. A 1969 narrative describes popke rera, warm wind. The companion table has the different heading 暑; the source pair 暖/ポプケ has direct lexical support.
References
Occurrences (1)
  1. National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics · 乾巻 · Page 17, line 14 · ポプケ

    …タ泥テイネトイ兀はげ山イビツ゚シル シリカハルムル寒メイ冷ヤム暖ポプケ熱セヽク湯セヽカ飛火アベプシ昔フシコ今タネ当年タンバ明年ヲヤバ去年シヤキネ去々年ホシケシヤキネ三…

「熱」

sesekmedium
The facsimile’s セヽ repeats se, agreeing with sesek hot in the dictionaries and oral contexts. The modern final k corresponds to the historical ク; literal seseku is an unconfirmed vowel-explicit comparison. The companion セハク differs from the recorded repetition; the dictionary and oral examples support sesek for this source pair.
References
Occurrences (1)
  1. National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics · 乾巻 · Page 17, line 15 · セヽク

    …ネトイ兀はげ山イビツ゚シル シリカハルムル寒メイ冷ヤム暖ポプケ熱セヽク湯セヽカ飛火アベプシ昔フシコ今タネ当年タンバ明年ヲヤバ去年シヤキネ去々年ホシケシヤキネ三年前ホシ…

「湯」

sesekkamedium
The recorded セヽ repeats se. Tamura, Kayano and Nakagawa give sesekka for heating or warming, supporting the doubled k in the modern form. Batchelor separately lists a heating verb and a hot-water noun Sesekka, the latter matching 湯; a second extraction of that edition also preserves the noun. Retrieved Mukawa contexts concern heating water, soup and other objects. Those verb uses do not establish a hot-water noun sense in modern usage. sesek wakka is a compositional comparison that adds an unrecorded water word. The historical noun/verb relationship remains qualified.
Tamura 1996 s.v. sesekka「…を熱くする、 …を沸かす、 …を温める。…」; Kayano 1996 s.v. sesekka「温める,熱くする,沸かす,焙る.…」; Batchelor 1938 s.v. Sesek-ka「v.t. To heat.」 and Sesekka「n. Hot water.」, PDF p.443Source passage
References
Occurrences (1)
  1. National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics · 乾巻 · Page 18, line 1 · セヽカ

    …はげ山イビツ゚シル シリカハルムル寒メイ冷ヤム暖ポプケ熱セヽク湯セヽカ飛火アベプシ昔フシコ今タネ当年タンバ明年ヲヤバ去年シヤキネ去々年ホシケシヤキネ三年前ホシケシヤキ…

「飛火」

apepusmedium
Kayano apepus describes fire jumping or an ember jumping, fitting 飛火. Batchelor Abe-push likewise means the fire jumps. The two joined-form corpus contexts concern the sound of fire crackling. ape pus is an attested spaced variant. apepusu has a different final vowel and means digging up or reviving the hearth fire; its two retrieved contexts concern that action. It does not supply an interchangeable normalization of the source’s シ ending.
References
Occurrences (1)
  1. National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics · 乾巻 · Page 18, line 2 · アベプシ

    …ツ゚シル シリカハルムル寒メイ冷ヤム暖ポプケ熱セヽク湯セヽカ飛火アベプシ昔フシコ今タネ当年タンバ明年ヲヤバ去年シヤキネ去々年ホシケシヤキネ三年前ホシケシヤキネイトコタ先…

「昔」

huskomedium
Tamura and Kayano identify husko as old or having passed through many years. Tamura includes old ancestors, while a 1969 narrative describes an old mortar and an old basket. This supports the form but leaves a grammatical distinction from Japanese 昔, which names past time. The vowel-explicit husiko has no corpus match. The source’s シ is preserved in the recorded form.
References
Occurrences (1)
  1. National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics · 乾巻 · Page 18, line 3 · フシコ

    …シリカハルムル寒メイ冷ヤム暖ポプケ熱セヽク湯セヽカ飛火アベプシ昔フシコ今タネ当年タンバ明年ヲヤバ去年シヤキネ去々年ホシケシヤキネ三年前ホシケシヤキネイトコタ先年ヘンバ…

タネ

Ainu

「今」

tanemedium
The dictionaries directly give tane now, fitting 今; 1969 oral contexts also use it for now or already. Tamura and Batchelor separately record the Japanese loan tane seed, and seed contexts occur in the corpus. The 4,202 string matches therefore combine senses and cannot be treated as 4,202 attestations of the temporal meaning.
References
Occurrences (1)
  1. National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics · 乾巻 · Page 18, line 4 · タネ

    …ルムル寒メイ冷ヤム暖ポプケ熱セヽク湯セヽカ飛火アベプシ昔フシコ今タネ当年タンバ明年ヲヤバ去年シヤキネ去々年ホシケシヤキネ三年前ホシケシヤキネイトコタ先年ヘンバラタ春…

「当年」

tanpamedium
Tamura and Kayano directly give tanpa this year, analysed as tan-pa, this-year. The source 当年 and the companion 當年 express the same Japanese heading with different character forms. A 1969 narrative uses tanpa for this year. Joined tanpa and spaced tan pa both occur, but the joined form also appears in a bridge narrative glossed this bank, so the total is not restricted to the year sense.
References
Occurrences (1)
  1. National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics · 乾巻 · Page 18, line 5 · タンバ

    …メイ冷ヤム暖ポプケ熱セヽク湯セヽカ飛火アベプシ昔フシコ今タネ当年タンバ明年ヲヤバ去年シヤキネ去々年ホシケシヤキネ三年前ホシケシヤキネイトコタ先年ヘンバラタ春バイカル夏…

「明年」

oyapamedium
Tamura and Kayano give oyapa next year, fitting 明年 and the recorded ヲヤバ. Tamura analyses oya-pa, other-year. A 1969 narrative promises to return on the same day next year. oya pa is a word-separated corpus comparison; the dictionaries support the joined headword.
References
Occurrences (1)
  1. National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics · 乾巻 · Page 18, line 6 · ヲヤバ

    …暖ポプケ熱セヽク湯セヽカ飛火アベプシ昔フシコ今タネ当年タンバ明年ヲヤバ去年シヤキネ去々年ホシケシヤキネ三年前ホシケシヤキネイトコタ先年ヘンバラタ春バイカル夏シヤク秋チ…

「去年」

saknemedium
Tamura and Nakagawa specify the previous summer. Tamura also allows tan sakne for this summer after it has passed. Batchelor gives a broader previous sense, with sakne pa for last year. The source’s 去年 thus has relevant historical comparison, while the modern seasonal meaning needs qualification. A 1969 oral context explicitly concerns the previous summer. sakine is a vowel-explicit comparison with no retrieved match.
Tamura 1996 s.v. sakne「去年の夏、 この前の夏。…」; Nakagawa 1995 s.v. sakne「去年の夏;〈参照〉ホシキサㇰネ hoskisakne、ホシキアンサㇰネ hoskiansakne。」; Batchelor 1938 s.v. Sakne「adv. Last. The previous. As:—Sakne chup, "last month." Sakne pa, "last year."」, PDF p.433Source passage
References
Occurrences (1)
  1. National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics · 乾巻 · Page 18, line 7 · シヤキネ

    …セヽク湯セヽカ飛火アベプシ昔フシコ今タネ当年タンバ明年ヲヤバ去年シヤキネ去々年ホシケシヤキネ三年前ホシケシヤキネイトコタ先年ヘンバラタ春バイカル夏シヤク秋チユク冬マタ早…

「去々年」

Nakagawa hoskisakne and Tamura hoski sakne mean the summer before last. NINJAL gives the joined form under おととし and also has hoski sakne pa, supporting comparison with 去々年. Its dictionary bot repeats the same material. Two 2015 newspaper examples use hoskisakne against Japanese 前年の夏, demonstrating why a fixed two-year offset cannot be inferred from every corpus occurrence. hoskiansakne refers to the summer three years back in Nakagawa and adds a syllable absent from this record; hoske sakne keeps the historical ケ vowel but lacks retrieved support.
Nakagawa 1995 s.v. hoskisakne「おととしの夏;〈参照〉サㇰネ sakne、ホシキアンサㇰネ hoskiansakne。」 and hoskiansakne「おととしの前の年の夏;〈参照〉ホシキサㇰネ hoskisakne。」; Tamura 1996 s.v. hoski「①先に、 最初に。… / に酔う。…」; NINJAL Topical Dictionary, 時間 #76Source passage
References
Occurrences (1)
  1. National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics · 乾巻 · Page 18, line 8 · ホシケシヤキネ

    …飛火アベプシ昔フシコ今タネ当年タンバ明年ヲヤバ去年シヤキネ去々年ホシケシヤキネ三年前ホシケシヤキネイトコタ先年ヘンバラタ春バイカル夏シヤク秋チユク冬マタ早春アロバイカルウシ …

「三年前」

NINJAL explicitly gives hoski sakne etoko ta for 三年前に. Tamura’s hoski sakne and temporal etoko ta explain the divisions and retain the final タ recorded here. The source begins the final element with イ rather than エ; hoskisakne itoko ta records that vowel-explicit alternative without an independent full-form match. The two complete spaced corpus matches are the dictionary row and a bot repost, representing one source. This supports the reading at medium confidence but does not establish its eighteenth-century grammar or an independently attested exact year offset. The companion ホシケシヤキ子ヱトコ lacks the final タ.
NINJAL Topical Dictionary of Conversational Ainu, 時間, ninjal-dict/017#41; Tamura 1996 s.v. hoski「①先に、 最初に。… / に酔う。…」, etoko(ho)「(概は etok エトㇰ) ①…の先、 前。…」, ta「①(強め) …こそ。… / (生活にいるものを地面や地下から)取って来る、 …を掘る(採取する)。… / ①(空間的・時間的位置を示す副詞句をつくる。… / ここに、 ほらここに、 これ。… / (舟)をほる(=木をくりぬいて丸木舟をつくる)。…」Source passage
References
Occurrences (1)
  1. National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics · 乾巻 · Page 18, line 9 · ホシケシヤキネイトコタ

    …今タネ当年タンバ明年ヲヤバ去年シヤキネ去々年ホシケシヤキネ三年前ホシケシヤキネイトコタ先年ヘンバラタ春バイカル夏シヤク秋チユク冬マタ早春アロバイカルウシ ホンハイカル夏至シヤクノシケ…

「先年」

Batchelor Hembarata and NINJAL hempara ta? mean when or at what time. The separated form accounts for the source’s syllables, but its fit with 先年 remains unexplained, leaving low confidence. hempara ka means sometime and is relevant to an indefinite-time explanation; it changes the final consonant. Tamura hempanno has a long-ago sense but a different form. Neither comparison establishes the printed expression as a previous-year term. The only hempara ta corpus match is NINJAL’s question. The companion gloss under 先年 explains it as いつの頃 and cannot independently resolve that mismatch.
References
Occurrences (1)
  1. National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics · 乾巻 · Page 18, line 10 · ヘンバラタ

    …去年シヤキネ去々年ホシケシヤキネ三年前ホシケシヤキネイトコタ先年ヘンバラタ春バイカル夏シヤク秋チユク冬マタ早春アロバイカルウシ ホンハイカル夏至シヤクノシケ夏の末シヤクケ…

「春」

paykarmedium
Tamura and Kayano directly identify paykar as spring, fitting 春 and バイカル. A 1969 narrative also uses paykar for spring. The source has イ, while the companion table prints バエカル; that transcription difference is separate from the direct lexical evidence. paykaru is an unconfirmed vowel-explicit comparison. No exact Gregorian month range is inferred from this historical heading.
References
Occurrences (1)
  1. National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics · 乾巻 · Page 18, line 11 · バイカル

    …去々年ホシケシヤキネ三年前ホシケシヤキネイトコタ先年ヘンバラタ春バイカル夏シヤク秋チユク冬マタ早春アロバイカルウシ ホンハイカル夏至シヤクノシケ夏の末シヤクケシ冬の末ベ…

「夏」

sakmedium
The summer noun sak is directly documented and occurs with mata winter in a 1969 oral context. The same spelling also means lacking or not having, which accounts for many unrelated matches. The two saku results are a personal name and a lack-expression, supplying no summer-sense support for retaining a final vowel. The recorded シヤク is preserved.
References
Occurrences (1)
  1. National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics · 乾巻 · Page 18, line 12 · シヤク

    …ケシヤキネ三年前ホシケシヤキネイトコタ先年ヘンバラタ春バイカル夏シヤク秋チユク冬マタ早春アロバイカルウシ ホンハイカル夏至シヤクノシケ夏の末シヤクケシ冬の末ベケレマタ…

「秋」

cukmedium
Tamura and Kayano directly give cuk autumn, agreeing with 秋 and チユク. A 1969 narrative uses cuk for the autumn when someone left home. The vowel-explicit cuku comparison has no retrieved match. The lexical identification does not by itself establish the historical season’s precise calendar boundaries.
References
Occurrences (1)
  1. National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics · 乾巻 · Page 18, line 13 · チユク

    …ネ三年前ホシケシヤキネイトコタ先年ヘンバラタ春バイカル夏シヤク秋チユク冬マタ早春アロバイカルウシ ホンハイカル夏至シヤクノシケ夏の末シヤクケシ冬の末ベケレマタ冬至マタ…

マタ

Ainu

「冬」

matamedium
Tamura gives mata as winter and as an adverb meaning in winter; Kayano gives winter or midwinter. The form and meaning directly fit 冬/マタ. A 1969 narrative contrasts sak summer with mata winter. The source does not assign exact month boundaries.
References
Occurrences (1)
  1. National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics · 乾巻 · Page 18, line 14 · マタ

    …ホシケシヤキネイトコタ先年ヘンバラタ春バイカル夏シヤク秋チユク冬マタ早春アロバイカルウシ ホンハイカル夏至シヤクノシケ夏の末シヤクケシ冬の末ベケレマタ冬至マタノンケ…

「早春」

Tamura segments the word as ar-o-paykar-us: ar- ‘really’ (ほんとに), o- ‘its bottom/end’ (その尻), paykar ‘spring’ (春), and us ‘… attaches to …’ (…に…がつく). The initial aro contains ar- and o-. She glosses the whole expression as ほんの春先に ‘at the very beginning of spring’; the entry does not explain the semantic connection between ‘its bottom/end’ and this meaning. Tamura explicitly records aropaykarus for very early spring, closely accounting for the complete アロバイカルウシ, including its final ウシ. The short arpaykar is attested in NINJAL and proposed by the companion transcription of アロバイカル, but omits part of this source form. Batchelor’s Aropaikara/Arupaikara provide shorter early-spring comparisons; Hirayama cites the latter. Whole aropaykarus has zero corpus matches, which does not cancel its dictionary attestation. Spaced aropaykar us and final-vowel aropaykarusi remain comparisons. Tamura’s modern March–early-April explanation is not assigned as a fixed date range for the historical record.
Tamura 1996 s.v. aropaykarus「ほんの春先(3月か4月の初め頃)に。…」; Hirayama 2013 part 3 s.v. アロパイカルウシ「① 早春;② 春ノ尤モ早イ時、早春(arupaikara)」; Batchelor 1938 s.v. Aropaikara「n. Very early spring.」 and Arupaikara「n. Very early spring.」, PDF p.52Source passage
References
Occurrences (1)
  1. National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics · 乾巻 · Page 18, line 15 · アロバイカルウシ

    …ヤキネイトコタ先年ヘンバラタ春バイカル夏シヤク秋チユク冬マタ早春アロバイカルウシ ホンハイカル夏至シヤクノシケ夏の末シヤクケシ冬の末ベケレマタ冬至マタノンケ中秋シイチユク正月ト…

「早春」

pon paykarmedium
Hirayama analyses the source as small plus spring, consistent with Tamura pon small/young and paykar spring. The printed pairing with アロバイカルウシ under 早春 gives useful source context. The whole expression has no retrieved corpus match, so the early-spring interpretation remains qualified by component analysis and the recorded heading. ponpaykar is a joined-spelling comparison. No modern seasonal or calendar boundary is imposed on this phrase.
Tamura 1996 s.v. pon「小さい、 少ない、 年若い、 幼い。…」 and paykar「春。…」; Hirayama 2013 part 3 s.v. ホンハイカル「① 早春;② 小さい (ボン)、春 (パイカラ)」Source passage
References
Occurrences (1)
  1. National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics · 乾巻 · Page 18, line 15 · ホンハイカル

    …ヘンバラタ春バイカル夏シヤク秋チユク冬マタ早春アロバイカルウシ ホンハイカル夏至シヤクノシケ夏の末シヤクケシ冬の末ベケレマタ冬至マタノンケ中秋シイチユク正月トイタンネチユツ…

「夏至」

saknoskemedium
The historical ケ agrees with the noske variant in Niida’s sak noske; Yoshimura gives sak noski. Tamura and Kayano identify saknoski as midsummer. Fukasawa discusses regional noske alongside noski, so replacing final e merely to match Saru spelling would obscure a documented variant. The summer-middle interpretation is supported, while the exact astronomical 夏至 sense is less secure. Tamura’s modern seasonal range does not date the historical solstice. The three spaced noske corpus hits include one NINJAL item and its bot copy.
References
Occurrences (1)
  1. National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics · 乾巻 · Page 19, line 1 · シヤクノシケ

    …カル夏シヤク秋チユク冬マタ早春アロバイカルウシ ホンハイカル夏至シヤクノシケ夏の末シヤクケシ冬の末ベケレマタ冬至マタノンケ中秋シイチユク正月トイタンネチユツプ ヱノミチユツ…

「夏の末」

sakkesmedium
Tamura directly identifies sakkes as late summer, matching 夏の末 and the sak-kes analysis. The source’s ケシ represents final kes in this normalization. Corpus contexts describe late summer or the transition into autumn; one Oda Steno context has duplicate records with the same URI. The 23 joined matches therefore exceed the number of independent passages. Modern seasonal boundaries are comparative evidence.
References
Occurrences (1)
  1. National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics · 乾巻 · Page 19, line 2 · シヤクケシ

    …ク冬マタ早春アロバイカルウシ ホンハイカル夏至シヤクノシケ夏の末シヤクケシ冬の末ベケレマタ冬至マタノンケ中秋シイチユク正月トイタンネチユツプ ヱノミチユツプ二月ハプラプチ…

「冬の末」

peker matamedium
Batchelor’s English definition places Pekere-mata at the end of winter, matching 冬の末, while its Japanese column says 初冬. A second extraction of the same edition preserves this conflict and supplies no independent attestation. Tamura and Kayano peker “bright, clear” support the modern stem without the historical final e. The whole phrase has no retrieved corpus match. Its seasonal sense remains qualified by the conflicting dictionary columns.
References
Occurrences (1)
  1. National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics · 乾巻 · Page 19, line 3 · ベケレマタ

    …バイカルウシ ホンハイカル夏至シヤクノシケ夏の末シヤクケシ冬の末ベケレマタ冬至マタノンケ中秋シイチユク正月トイタンネチユツプ ヱノミチユツプ二月ハプラプチユツプ三月モキウ…

「冬至」

Batchelor records Mata-noshke for midwinter; Kayano matanoski and Niida’s mata noski have the same seasonal sense. The facsimile’s two-stroke glyph remains compatible with the transcribed ン, so matanoske requires a シ comparison that is stated explicitly. The companion edition writes マタノシケ. Winter’s middle does not establish the precise astronomical 冬至 meaning. Literal matanonke has no retrieved support, and the identification remains low confidence.
References
Occurrences (1)
  1. National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics · 乾巻 · Page 19, line 4 · マタノンケ

    …ホンハイカル夏至シヤクノシケ夏の末シヤクケシ冬の末ベケレマタ冬至マタノンケ中秋シイチユク正月トイタンネチユツプ ヱノミチユツプ二月ハプラプチユツプ三月モキウタチユツプ四月…

「中秋」

sicukmedium
Batchelor directly records Shi-chuk for mid-autumn, matching 中秋. Modern s/c spelling yields sicuk, with the recorded シイ represented without an added vowel-length distinction. The full sicuk form has no retrieved corpus occurrence. The more frequent sitcuk and sircuk are explicitly “become autumn” in Kayano and Nakagawa and occur in that sense in the inspected contexts. Their extra consonant and different function make them comparisons with limited relevance to the mid-autumn expression.
References
Occurrences (1)
  1. National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics · 乾巻 · Page 19, line 5 · シイチユク

    …至シヤクノシケ夏の末シヤクケシ冬の末ベケレマタ冬至マタノンケ中秋シイチユク正月トイタンネチユツプ ヱノミチユツプ二月ハプラプチユツプ三月モキウタチユツプ四月シキウタチユツ…

「正月」

Toitanne-chup preserves the recorded トイタンネ and final チユツプ; toytannecup supplies modern glide spelling and a joined month-name form. Batchelor’s Japanese column gives the second month, while its English column gives January. Hirayama repeats the second-month comparison. Kayano toetannecup and Tamura towetanne identify the first month but differ in the vowel sequence; the companion transcription differs again as トウタン子. These forms support a month-name family, while the precise historical vowel analysis and calendar alignment remain low confidence. No full toytannecup corpus match was retrieved.
References
Occurrences (1)
  1. National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics · 乾巻 · Page 19, line 6 · トイタンネチユツプ

    …夏の末シヤクケシ冬の末ベケレマタ冬至マタノンケ中秋シイチユク正月トイタンネチユツプ ヱノミチユツプ二月ハプラプチユツプ三月モキウタチユツプ四月シキウタチユツプ五月モハウタチユツプ…

「正月」

The recorded final チユツプ supplies cup “month”, so the full interpretation is enomicup. Nakagawa distinguishes e-nomi “pray to with something” from i-nomi “perform worship”; the source’s ヱ supports e, while inomicup is the directly attested New Year month name in Tamura and Kayano. Batchelor Enomi is a worship verb and does not attest the complete historical month name. The 14 enomi corpus matches concern worship; none attests enomicup. Inomicup occurs in a 1983 narrative and in NINJAL, with a later bot copy of the dictionary. The e/i relationship remains qualified.
Nakagawa 1995 s.v. enomi「〜で〜を祈る;→ノミ nomi。」 and nomi「〜に祈る。…」; Tamura 1996 s.v. cup「①(年月日の)月 ②…カ月(月数の単位)。… / (所は cupi(hi) チュピ(ヒ))女性の生殖器としての腹、 おなか。… / 月、 太陽。…」 and inomicup「正月(旧暦の正月、 今の二月に当たる)。…」; Batchelor 1938 s.v. Enomi「v.t. To worship with libations.」 and Inomi-chup「n. January. The month of libations; possibly so called from the Japanese custom of paying visits and drinking at the new…」Source passage
References
Occurrences (1)
  1. National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics · 乾巻 · Page 19, line 6 · ヱノミチユツプ

    …末ベケレマタ冬至マタノンケ中秋シイチユク正月トイタンネチユツプ ヱノミチユツプ二月ハプラプチユツプ三月モキウタチユツプ四月シキウタチユツプ五月モハウタチユツプ六月シマウタチユ…

「二月」

haprapcupmedium
Kayano directly gives haprapcup for the second month. The 1998 radio lesson also uses that meaning, and a 2001 newspaper context writes haprap cup for February. Batchelor instead assigns Haprapchup to March; NINJAL’s shorter haprap also has the third-month gloss. Tamura’s haprap is an eighth-month name with a leaf-related explanation. The spelling and source’s second-month identification have support within particular traditions; these attestations do not establish one universal month number or etymology.
References
Occurrences (1)
  1. National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics · 乾巻 · Page 19, line 7 · ハプラプチユツプ

    …タノンケ中秋シイチユク正月トイタンネチユツプ ヱノミチユツプ二月ハプラプチユツプ三月モキウタチユツプ四月シキウタチユツプ五月モハウタチユツプ六月シマウタチユツプ七月モニヨーラプ…

「三月」

Kayano records the full mokiwtacup form for the third month and supplies an example about spring warming and melting snow. Batchelor assigns Mokiuta-chup to April. Tamura’s shorter kiwtacup is a third-month name, but its plant identification is explicitly discussed as variable. The recorded モ and full ending agree with the selected form. No complete corpus match was retrieved; the dictionary supports the identification while the month offset and botanical explanation remain qualified.
References
Occurrences (1)
  1. National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics · 乾巻 · Page 19, line 8 · モキウタチユツプ

    …ク正月トイタンネチユツプ ヱノミチユツプ二月ハプラプチユツプ三月モキウタチユツプ四月シキウタチユツプ五月モハウタチユツプ六月シマウタチユツプ七月モニヨーラプ八月シュヨーラプ九月…

「四月」

The modern glide spelling sikiwtacup occurs in a 2004 newspaper passage explicitly glossed 四月. Kayano records sikiutacup for the fourth month; its printed segmentation is si-ki-uta-cup, so the kana alone does not settle the internal analysis. NINJAL gives sikiwtacup for the fifth month. Batchelor’s Japanese column also gives the fifth month while its English says April, a conflict retained in a second extraction of the same edition. The form is supported, with calendar and segmentation qualifications.
References
Occurrences (1)
  1. National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics · 乾巻 · Page 19, line 9 · シキウタチユツプ

    …ツプ ヱノミチユツプ二月ハプラプチユツプ三月モキウタチユツプ四月シキウタチユツプ五月モハウタチユツプ六月シマウタチユツプ七月モニヨーラプ八月シュヨーラプ九月ウンボケチユツプ十月…

「五月」

The facsimile supports ハ in モハウタ. Hirayama lists the historical heading with no modern identification. Kayano momawtacup is a strong semantic alternative for the fifth month, and Batchelor Momauta-chup is assigned to June. Tamura’s shorter mawtacup also belongs to the rose-fruit month-name family. Substituting momawtacup requires an unexplained h/m difference in the source. Neither full form was retrieved in the corpus. Mohawtacup remains a low-confidence reading; the tempting plant-based explanation is conditional.
References
Occurrences (1)
  1. National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics · 乾巻 · Page 19, line 10 · モハウタチユツプ

    …二月ハプラプチユツプ三月モキウタチユツプ四月シキウタチユツプ五月モハウタチユツプ六月シマウタチユツプ七月モニヨーラプ八月シュヨーラプ九月ウンボケチユツプ十月シユナンチユツプ十一…